← Back to use cases
Media / Publishing Ownership GapData Hub

Editorial content pipeline with AI enrichment

Pain

A publisher was pulling editorial content from multiple wire services and internal systems, each with its own schema and metadata format. Getting that content out to the web CMS, the print system, and social channels meant manual reformatting and asset creation. Two editorial FTEs spent their days on plumbing instead of journalism.

What we built

An ingestion pipeline that normalises content from every source into a single schema, applies editorial filtering rules (by topic, region, and rights), then runs LLM processing to generate summaries and headlines for each channel. Content that lacks visuals gets images generated automatically. The enriched package routes to each destination system without manual intervention.

flowchart LR
W1[Wire service 1] --> NORM[Normalise<br>schema]
W2[Wire service 2] --> NORM
INT[Internal CMS] --> NORM
NORM --> FILT[Filter]
FILT --> LLM[LLM enrichment<br>summaries + headlines]
LLM --> IMG[Image<br>generation]
IMG --> CMS[Web CMS]
IMG --> PRINT[Print]
IMG --> SOC[Social]

What we own

We monitor every wire feed for availability and schema changes. If an upstream format drifts, we catch it before it reaches the CMS. We also run quality guardrails on LLM output, a dead letter queue for content that fails validation, and daily volume anomaly detection to flag drops before the editorial team notices.

Business outcome

Two FTEs moved back to editorial work. Content reaches all channels within minutes instead of hours. AI-generated assets are clearly flagged for editorial review before publication, so the team keeps control without the manual bottleneck.

Have a similar challenge? Tell us which systems need to connect. Fixed-price scoping quote within 48 hours.

Request a scoping call